How Apple Devoured Qualcomm's Market Dominance

Quite a lot went wrong at Qualcomm this yr - the chip maker showtime lost its 1 of the biggest consumers in the shape of Samsung and so faced some serious Snapdragon 810 overheating bug. Before information technology was believed that this overheating effect was actually the reason Samsung had to move away to its own, in-firm Exynos chip. Still, it couldn't have been possible for Sammy to come up out with full power and produce such an amazing, powerful and perfect flake in less than a few months.

- Galaxy S6 Bugs and Their Fixes - Android Tips

Another report confirmed this by revealing that it was besides the huge patent royalties that caused Sammy to stay away from Qualcomm. So what exactly went wrong with the scrap maker this yr having then many years of authorisation and business intelligence / manipulation experience? Was this a tactic from Samsung to give a hint - and a stumble - to Qualcomm that it has to a lot to catch up on and cannot but inquire billions of dollars in royalties?

Or did Apple tree cause Qualcomm stumble?

While Samsung had good reasons to stay abroad from Qualcomm's Snapdragon 810 chipset this year, it seems this Qualcomm pass up was long time coming. While definitely not an end for the scrap maker because a plenty of important patents that information technology holds and will keep to swallow upward royalties, this year certainly proved to be a wake up call for the company.

The discussion on this heatedissue has never died fifty-fifty though Qualcomm is making major decisions to make the media move away from the overheating problems.

In an interesting have, a reddit user explains how it could be Apple behind this game to hurt Qualcomm authorisation in the earth of chips and smartphones. It'south a long story so take hold of a cuppa tea, may exist?

Apple'southward business organisation strategy in 2022-13 must take been to go total throttle on 64 bit adoption, since information technology was an 'south' year.Plan: Employ the 5s yr to pave way for the 64 bit code migration for iOS 8 and iPhone 6. Be starting time out of the gate, and catch Qualcomm and Samsung off baby-sit.

Apple's early jump rocked mobile chip roadmaps. Now Qualcomm looks behind. Information technology has to spend 2022 on intense 64-scrap chip blueprint, possibly earlier than planned.

Then Google announces Android L with 64-bit support in Art. And only ARMv8 can handle the increased encryption demands from L. At present Qualcomm actually needs to get it right, given phone companies want Lollipop in Q1 2022. Yet time and resources are tight, possibly too tight for their next-gen core pattern. [emphasis, ours]

So Qualcomm uses the reference ARM Cortex A57/53 cores in big.LITTLE. And they stick with xx nm for the 810. The custom Kryo cores and fourteen nm Finfet volition go in the SD 820. The 810 volition tide us over.

Except, Samsung has gone all out in the S6 with the all-time Exynos however and 14 nm from Samsung LSI fabs. Given the promising internal results with S6's Project Zippo, Samsung said NO to the 810.

And then the overheating rumours started, and were realized in the M9's throttling.

Qualcomm may take lost Samsung's contract for skilful [...]

And as Intel and Samsung's LTE modems get improve, Qualcomm may lose its potency.

And that's how Apple unintentionally made Qualcomm stumble, with a move 1.5 years before that was planned 3 years earlier.

Applause! For some reason, it sounds usual to read that a third company staged this while we may have blamed it on TSMC foundries and Qualcomm for messing things up on the chip design. Simply anyway, it seems no less illogical anyway. What do you lot think of this side of the story?

-Source: Reddit| via: Phone Arena